The following statement is exactly the kind of articulation of an alternative faith which is normative and fully supported in Northern Michigan - and is exactly the sort of faith which bishop-elect Thew Forrester holds dear.
Please, I invite your comment.
Already One God
On the 19th of February, 2007, the Primates of the Anglican Communion, meeting in Dar es Salaam, released a Communiqué. We, as the Diocese of Northern Michigan, offer our response.
Unity is a Grace
We recognize that a basic challenge to us in the Anglican Communion is centered in our vision of who God is and who we are. In classical theology, we only exist because God exists in us. The ramifications of this insight are both profound and extensive. Unity is not an achievement. Unity is not, in its most basic sense, a work of human hands. Unity is a grace. Unity is a given.
We affirm the theological truth that we are always already one in God; otherwise we would not be. The tragedy of the current moment, which is recurrent throughout history (remember the conflict that led to the first council in Jerusalem), is that we fail to see this unity and so we grow anxious and afraid.
In our anxiety, we tend to confuse the absence of conflict with love. Love is patient and love is kind, to be sure. Love also knows conflict is a part of the human condition, as we respond to God’s invitation to remove any and all boundaries to the scope of God’s eternal embrace.
Listen, Learn, Lead
We acknowledge that our Communion is in conflict. We know this conflict in our parishes, in our dioceses, in our church, in our culture. We often fail to recognize, however, that conflict is not resolved by assuming the agenda of the person across the table and making it our own. Years of interfaith dialogue have taught this truth. Conflict is not resolved by the denial of who one essentially is. Decades of ecumenical dialogue have taught this truth.
Conflict is resolved through honest recognition and respect of who we all are, in our diversity. The Anglican Communion is itself rooted in this mutual recognition and respect among its Churches. Unity may not be collapsed into uniformity, making one parish’s, dioceses’ or Church’s polity or ethics determinative for everyone else.
Because God is always already present, leadership begins with being receptive to what someone has to say. Leadership is about continually learning and being transformed in heart, mind and body. Leadership is a response to this learning, which is a continual movement of the Spirit.
We invite all to God’s table. What we expect, in turn, is that those who come to the table likewise recognize the right, by being children of God, of everyone else to be at the table.
Baptismal Ecclesiology
We proclaim by word and example the Good News of God in Christ that everyone and everything belongs. We are continually being created in the image of God, in whom we live and move and have our being. Baptism confirms this most basic truth which is at once, the Good News: all is of God, without condition and without restriction.
We seek and serve Christ in all persons because all persons are the living Christ. Each and every human being, as a human being, is knit together in God’s Spirit, and thus an anointed one – Christ. Jesus of Nazareth reveals this as the basic truth of the human condition:
God is more in me than if the whole sea
could in a little sponge wholly contained be. ~Angelus Silesius
We strive for justice and peace among all people, and respect the dignity of every human being, because each person embodies the living God. Life is inherently and thoroughly sacramental, which is why we love one another without condition. We stand with Meister Eckhart who, when he gazed deep within himself, as well as all about him, saw that "the entire created order is sacred" as it is grounded in God. We do harmful and evil things to ourselves and one another, not because we are bad, but because we are blind to the beauty of creation and ourselves. In other words, we are ignorant of who we truly are: "there is no Greek or Hebrew; no Jew or Gentile; no barbarian or Scythian; no slave or citizen. There is only Christ, who is all in all." (Colossians 3:11).
Everyone is the sacred word of God, in whom Christ lives. This baptismal vision of a thoroughly blessed creation leads us to understand the reason for the incarnation in a new way:
People think God has only become a human being there – in his historical incarnation – but that is not so; for God is here – in this very place – just as much incarnate as in a human being long ago. And this is why he has become a human being: that he might give birth to you as his only begotten Son, and as no less. ~Meister Eckhart
Affirmations
Because each and every one of us is an only begotten child of God; because we, as the church, are invited by God to see all of creation as having life only insofar as it is in God; because everything, without exception, is the living presence, or incarnation, of God; as the Diocese of Northern Michigan,
We affirm Christ present in every human being and reject any attempt to restructure The Episcopal Church’s polity in a manner contrary to the principles of the baptismal covenant;
We affirm the full dignity and autonomy and interdependence of every Church in the Anglican Communion and reject any attempt of the Primates to assume an authority they do not have nor have ever possessed;
We affirm the sacramental gift of all persons, their Christ-ness, especially those who are gay and lesbian, and reject any moratorium on the blessing of same-sex unions and consents of gay bishops, as it would compromise their basic dignity.
August 11, 2007
Standing Committee
General Convention Delegation
Et. Al.
6 comments:
"Baptism confirms this most basic truth which is at once, the Good News: all is of God, without condition and without restriction."
This seems much more like Vedanta than the Gospel. It's a free country, and if people want to practice Vedanta that's their business - but they should stop trying to disguise it as Christianity, or trying to reshape the Church into a Vendanta Society.
Fr Jones, thanks for posting this. I agree that it seems to be more of a salvo against conforming to the auspices of TEC all-the-while using nothing but a "just because" argument to try and convince the audience that it isn't.
My wife and I baptized our 10 month old this past Easter Vigil. Why? Among many correct and applicable answers to be given here, the primary answer that stands out to me is this: Because we want to show little Henry and the community of faith into which we have brought him that we belong to him (Henry), he to God and God to us. This is the theological contract, or exchange, as it were, that we enter in to via the Baptismal Covenant.
In order for a people driven by covenant relationship to understand one another, they must first have a sense of belonging to one another. This has been shown to me through the years as authentic Christian friendship (we talk alot about this in EFM, btw). I'm convinced that this is what the world is missing--a sense of belonging, authentically, to others in faithful community.
TEC, in and through its practices and theology, presents an excellent path to the feet of God by continually examining what it is to be in healthy community and what authentic Christian friendship looks like. There is a constant need (and I argue a requirement) for us to participate in that journey, however. We cannot simply call ourselves one thing and go off and engage in other activities or beliefs which counter this common ingredient.
Again, amongst the many other reasons why we offered our little guy this year for the holy sacrament of baptism, the primary reason is because we agree that he and we should be and remain a part of that community.
My Wesleyan upbringing leads me to believe that this community will continually seek and abide in the grace and love of God by continually seeking and abiding in one another. By being my brother's keeper (and he mine), we're reminded that God is our keeper, that God is the seeking shepherd, and, thankfully, the most "moved mover". The Baptismal Covenant certainly affirms this belief.
All of that to say that for the fine folks of the Dioceses of N. Michigan, they must realize that if they're going to consider themselves members of TEC, then they must inherently agree with its tenants and statements of faith. I agree that based upon what is provided here, it sounds like something quite a bit different.
There is a failure to understand theological terminology as we have received it from our ancestors in faith. Coupled with this is a lack of nuance so that easy-conflations are made that confuse or lead into error. For example, this stands out as contra-Nicaea:
Because each and every one of us is an only begotten child of God...because everything, without exception, is the living presence, or incarnation, of GodOne cannot then go on to claim The Baptismal Covenant of our Prayer Book as rejection of anything, while at the same time denying the heart of that Covenant, namely the God in Whom we receive and place our trust and into Whom we are baptized in "indissoluable bond" as professed in The Apostles' Creed. This language is almost word-for-word the same confusion found in the book I reviewed.
How about this instead?
I've responded to this (quoting Greg's good observations) in a posting entitled "Beyond Apostasy."
Good God!
Post a Comment