Friday, August 1, 2008

Why Not This Covenant?

Over twenty years ago, in 1984, the Anglican Consultative Council put forward a basic notion of the Christian mission in general. The 'five marks of mission' formula has become the basis for Anglican discussion of mission since then.

The five marks of mission are:

  • To proclaim the Good News of the Kingdom
  • To teach, baptise and nurture new believers
  • To respond to human need by loving service
  • To seek to transform unjust structures of society
  • To strive to safeguard the integrity of creation and sustain and renew the life of the earth
Now, it occurred to the the Inter Anglican Standing Commission on Mission and Evangelism a few years ago that perhaps this was the best basis for the Covenant suggested by the Windsor Report. The notion that we need to come together in self-giving and self-restraint for the sake of the mission of God is very compelling I think.

Here is what they put forward in 2005:

A Covenant For Communion In Mission

...God’s work through Jesus, empowered by the Holy Spirit, is to seek to heal [the world's] hurts and reconcile its brokenness. The preamble reminds us that as Christians we are called to share our relationships in the mission of God to the wider world, bearing witness to the kingdom of love, justice and joy that Jesus inaugurated...

Nourished by Scripture and Sacrament, we pledge ourselves to:

  1. Recognise Jesus in each other’s contexts and lives
    The nine points begin with Jesus Christ, the source and inspiration of our faith and calls for those covenanting for mission to look for, recognise, learn from and rejoice in the presence of Christ at work in the lives and situations of the other.
  2. Support one another in our participation in God’s mission
    Point two acknowledges that we cannot serve God’s mission in isolation and calls for mutual support and encouragement in our efforts.
  3. Encourage expressions of our new life in Christ
    Point three asks those who enter into the covenant to encourage one another as we develop new understandings of our identities in Christ.
  4. Meet to share common purpose and explore differences and disagreements
    Point four provides for face-to-face meetings at which insights and learnings can be shared and difficulties worked through.
  5. Be willing to change in response to critique and challenge from others
    Point five recognises that as challenges arise changes will be needed as discipleship in Christ is deepened as a result of both experience in mission and encounters with those with whom we are in covenant.
  6. Celebrate our strengths and mourn over our failures
    Point six calls for honouring and celebrating our successes and acknowledging and naming our sadness and failures in the hopes of restitution and reconciliation.
  7. Share equitably our God-given resources
    Point seven emphasises that there are resources to share – not just money and people, but ideas, prayers, excitement, challenge, enthusiasm. It calls for a move to an equitable sharing of such resources particularly when one participant in the Covenant has more than the other.
  8. Work together for the sustainability of God’s creation
    Point eight underscores that God’s concern is for the whole of life – not just people, but the whole created order – and so we are called to strive to safeguard the integrity of creation and to sustain and renew the life of the earth.
  9. Live into the promise of God’s reconciliation for ourselves and for the world
    This last point speaks of the future hope towards which we are living, the hope of a reconciled universe – in which ‘God’s will be done on earth as it is in heaven’ for which Jesus taught us to pray.

We make this covenant in the promise of our mutual responsibility and interdependence in the Body of Christ.


1 comment:

Fr. Bryan Owen said...

Yes, why not this? Or the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral, particularly if one's concerns center around the dogmatic core of the faith (as mine do)? Or both?!

I've really been struggling with this whole "Anglican Covenant" thing, and the more I think about it, the more I think that between the Quadrilateral or the "5 marks of mission" formula, the only reason for insisting on anything else is to gain the leverage to exercise some kind of power and control over others (particularly those with whom one disagrees).

Not only is that a bad idea, it's also not Anglican. And - just as important - the starting principle of over-defined doctrinal conformity (and I write that as someone deeply concerned with core doctrine) is a recipe for 'being in communion' already available in many other Christian churches.

I find it ironic that we're being asked to sacrifice our identity as Anglicans in order to ... maintain our identity as Anglicans(!).